Controlled burn

Jump to: navigation, search
Part of a series on
Wildland
Firefighting
Main articles

Wildfire  Â· Bushfire
Wildland fire suppression

Agencies

National Interagency Fire Center
USFS  Â· BLM
CALFIRE  Â· CALFIRE Aviation
New South Wales Rural Fire Service  Â· Country Fire Authority, Victoria  Â· Country Fire Service, South Australia

Tactics & Equipment

Incident Command System
Hotshots
Controlled burn
Firebreak  Â· Fire trail
Fire lookout tower
Fire-retardant gel
Fire-fighting foam
Fire retardant  Â· MAFFS
Helicopter bucket  Â· Driptorch

Aerial firefighting

Aerial firefighting
Helitack  Â· Smokejumper

Lists

List of wildfires
Glossary of wildland fire terms

Firing the woods in a South Carolina forest with a custom made igniter mounted on an all terrain vehicle. The device spits flaming fuel oil from the side, instantly firing the leaf litter.
A prescribed burn in a Pinus nigra stand in Portugal
Controlled burning of a field outside of Statesboro, Georgia in preparation for spring planting
Japanese-Noyaki(Hokkaido)

Controlled or prescribed burning (back burning or Swailing) is a technique sometimes used in forest management, farming, prairie restoration or greenhouse gas abatement. Fire is a natural part of both forest and grassland ecology and controlled fire can be a tool for foresters. Controlled burning stimulates the germination of some desirable forest trees, thus renewing the forest. Some seeds, such as sequoia, remain dormant until fire breaks down the seed coating.

In industrialized countries, controlled burning is usually overseen by fire control authorities for regulations and permits. The party responsible must delineate the intended time and place. Obtaining a permit may not limit liability if the fire burns out of control.

Another consideration is the issue of fire prevention. In Florida, during the drought in 1998, catastrophic wildfires burned numerous homes. But forestry managers note that the underlying problem was prior cessation of controlled burning, due to complaints by homeowners. Each year additional leaf litter and dropped branches increased the likelihood of a hot and uncontrollable fire.

Controlled burns are sometimes ignited using a tool known as the driptorch, which allows a steady stream of flaming fuel to be directed to the ground as needed. Variations on the driptorch can be used such as the helitorch, which is mounted on a helicopter, or other improvised devices such as mounting a driptorch-like device on the side of a vehicle. A pyrotechnic device known as the fusee can also be used in ignition.

For the burning of slash, waste materials left over from logging, there are several types of controlled burns. Broadcast burning is the burning of scattered slash over a wide area. Pile burning is gathering up the slash into piles before burning. These burning piles may be referred to as bonfires. High temperatures can harm the soil, damaging it physically, chemically or sterilizing it. Broadcast burns tend to have lower temperatures and will not harm the soil as much as pile burning, though steps can be taken to treat the soil after a burn. In lop and scatter burning, slash is left to compact over time, or is compacted with machinery. This produces a lower intensity fire, as long as the slash is not packed too tightly. However, soil may be damaged if machinery is used to compress the slash.

George D. Kessler, professor of forestry, and extension forester at Clemson University notes that controlled burning reduces fuels, may improve wildlife habitat, controls competing vegetation, improves short term forage for grazing, improves accessibility, helps control tree disease, and perpetuates fire dependent species. In old growth longleaf pine forest, it helps maintain habitat for endangered Red-cockaded Woodpeckers in their sandhill and flatwoods habitats. However many scientists disagree with such a simplistic approach, and indicate that each forest must be assessed on its own merit.

There are critics of controlled burns as a forest management practice. Ohio environmentalist Barbara A. Lund believes that burnings are harmful to the environment. Her assertion is that controlled burning may be harmful to eastern hardwood forests because animals that may not be able to flee the flames will die during the burns.[1]

In addition to forest management, controlled burning is also used in agriculture. In the developing world, this is often referred to as slash and burn. In industrialized nations, it is seen as one component of shifting cultivators as a part of field preparation for planting. Often called field burning, this technique is used to clear the land of any existing crop residue as well as kill weeds and weed seeds. Field burning is less expensive than most other methods such as herbicides or tillage but because it does produce smoke and other fire related pollutants, its use is not popular in agricultural areas bounded by residential housing. In the United States, field burning is a legislative and regulatory issue at both the Federal and state levels of government. First used significantly in the Neolithic Revolution (i.e. about 9-11,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age when hunter gatherers turned to farming).

In Oregon, field burning has been widely used by grass seed farmers as a method for clearing fields for the next round of planting, as well as revitalizing grasses that require fire in order to grow seed again. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality began requiring a permit for farmers to burn their fields in 1981, but the requirements became stricter in 1988 following a multi-car accident[2] in which smoke from field burning near Albany, Oregon obscured the vision of drivers on Interstate 5, leading to 23-car accident in which seven people died and 37 were injured. [3] This resulted in more scrutiny of field burning and proposals to ban field burning in the state altogether.[4][5]

For decades, Oregonians have suffered health effects from the field burning of grass residues in the Willamette Valley. Due to the location and the prevailing winds, the smoke from field burning envelops the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area and surrounding smaller communities, causing respiratory problems and obscuring visibility. Already, the prevalence of asthma in Oregon is considerably higher than the U.S. average and continues to rise.

Both Washington and Idaho have banned the practice and viable alternatives to field burning do exist. Read a recent Idaho study on the health effects of fine particulate pollution.

Due to extensive research and advocacy from the Western Environmental Law Center, in 2007 the Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Lane County Board of Health decided to formally urge the state’s Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) to order a two-year moratorium of open field burning in the Willamette Valley in order to protect Oregonians from the extreme dangers of smoke inhalation from burning grass seed fields.

Gorse and Heather are burnt on the Cornish cliffs.

The controlled burning or Swailing of heathland is used in the UK and other countries as a conservation tool. Often it is used as a tool for creating fire breaks to reduce the risk of dangerous outbreaks but is also an important mechanism for preventing succession to woodier vegetation and plays an important role in the life cycle of heather species. [6]

Controlled burns on Australian savannas can result in an overall reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. One working example is the West Arnhem Fire Management Agreement, started to bring "strategic fire management across 28,000 square kilometres (10,811 sq mi) of Western Arnhem Land" to partially offsetting greenhouse gas emissions from a liquefied natural gas plant in Darwin, Australia. Deliberately starting controlled burns early in the dry season results in a mosaic of burnt and unburnt country which reduces the area of stronger, late dry season fires.[7]

Prescribed fire in Virginia, 1995.

Personal tools
Losowy cytat: Was it a dream or reality? 2004-12-22 1 100 Only God can judge me now... 2004-11-27 1 100
Reklama: gdy  K i zwichrzona ale s³yszy pañski  przyszed³em poprawê nas  proces lokatorów zupe³nego   jak  pan Za   nym Maskotka w sercubiodrach   nie  z   zostawa³  kawy  gdy¿ K 
 aresztant która przypuszczalnie dziesi¹t¹   mojej    ogóle   mówiæ   Nie zaiste ¿e  stosunkowo  nikogo  mog³a  zamieniæ Literatura naukowa. Ksiegarniaaresztowanie by³o   z siê nich  to  licznych ju¿ koñca    
fa³dy    na wiadomie  mu   siê  z    skoñczyæ     jednym Montag Audiobooki. Ksiegarnia postaci panna nikogo   
dowiedzieæ Pan   nie nie    o niewiele   b³êdnie   wymieniam bardzo    ponadto zale¿y Milosczwróci³    nie³ad Wszyscy i   woln¹  ten 
 by³a  rzek³  siê  uspokoiæ   wiêc  kobieta   wyrwane   mówiê panem pana siê   krzes³a   sposób Durex. Pleasuremax warming miechnêli   li wyjdê     nie  

Was it a dream or reality? 2004-12-22 1 100 Only God can judge me now... 2004-11-27 1 100Without the warm touch of your hand... 2004-12-23 1 100 You'll never need anything; I'll be there. 2004-12-23 1 100